Public Meeting, July 8 in London: Andrew Kliman on ‘Causes and Implications of the Economic Crisis’

Posted: June 27th, 2009 | Author: MHI | Filed under: Economic Crisis, Events | Tags: , , , , | 2 Comments »

Andrew Kliman on ‘Causes and Implications of the Economic Crisis’

Wednesday 8 July
Lucas Arms (upstairs room)
245a Grays Inn Road
St Pancras, London (Kings Cross tube)
8 to 10 pm.

Andrew Kliman is author of Reclaiming Marx’s “Capital” and a member of Marxist-Humanist Initiative. Meeting sponsored jointly by The Hobgoblin and The Commune.


Fictitious Capital and Credit Schemes

Posted: May 6th, 2009 | Author: Guest Author | Filed under: Economic Crisis, Events | Tags: , , , | No Comments »

The following is a talk given by Michael Egoavil at the Left Forum 2009 panel “Marx’s ‘Capital’ and the Economic Crisis”. Michael can be reached at michaelegoavil@gmail.com.

Today I’m going to be discussing Marx’s theory of fictitious capital and its relation to real capital accumulation. Along the way I’m going to focus on Marx’s seldom-read analysis of a French bank known as the Credit Mobilier, in which this theory played a fundamental role. I’ll conclude with some thoughts on how this relates to socialist politics today.

Read the rest of this entry »


Brief Comments on the Relationship between Marxism and the Hegelian Dialectic

Posted: May 5th, 2009 | Author: C S | Filed under: Philosophy | Tags: , , , , | 61 Comments »

This article originally appeared in May of 2008 in Marxist-Humanism Today, the online publication of the now-defunct Marxist-Humanist Committee.

“It is impossible completely to understand Marx’s Capital, and especially its first chapter, without having thoroughly studied and understood the whole of Hegel’s Logic. Consequently, half a century later none of the Marxists understood Marx!”

                                                                –V. I. Lenin, Conspectus of Hegel’s Science of Logic [1]

Marx says in his Postface to the second edition of Volume 1 of Capital [2] that his method is none other than the dialectic. It is not, however, a direct application of the Hegelian dialectic. On the contrary, Marx tells us that the dialectic in Hegel–based on the journey and self-development of the Idea, of which the world is a result or “external appearance”–is exactly the opposite of his own. With Marx we have a materialist dialectic wherein the Idea is a “reflection” of the real world rather than its creator [3]. And yet Marx also goes on to call himself a “pupil of that mighty thinker [Hegel],” and says that the “mystification which the dialectic suffers in Hegel’s hands by no means prevents him from being the first to present its general forms of motion in a comprehensive and conscious manner,” calling the “rational kernel” inherent in Hegel’s dialectic “critical and revolutionary” [4].

Read the rest of this entry »


Left Forum 2009: Marx’s ‘Capital’ and the Crisis

Posted: April 28th, 2009 | Author: A | Filed under: Economic Crisis, Events | Tags: , , , , , | No Comments »

The panel “Marx’s ‘Capital’ and the Crisis”, sponsored by Critique of Political Economy (COPE) and the New SPACE, has been posted online thanks to one of the panelists, Brendan M. Cooney (on the web at kapitalism101).

The video series below contains an introduction by Radhika Desai and presentations by Brendan, Andrew Kliman, and Alan Freeman.